A very common trope and role of the elderly is to be stand-ins for money, wisdom and/or plot, with sometimes a little bit of ableism and “elderly are burdens” bigotry mixed in.
This one dimensional and cynical use of old people is on par with the perceived notion that they are burdens, or at least unwelcome but begrudging ones. The ‘burden’ perception comes from the fact that they are primarily an economic one.
One issue that stands out economically is one of pensions. Pakistan has been a country of historically poor coverage of employment and unemployment benefits, rendering pensions magnitude And coverage crucial to continued survival.
The problem here is that there is the pension system is not exactly the fairest there is. A lot of the coverage is focused on the government servants. Therefore, economic issues of the old aged folk are a very near and dear problem that has persisted in society for decades.
It seems pertinent to mention now that culturally, the elderly has a great and revered place in the stricture of society. They Are seen as guides in terms of wisdom, knowledge, tradition and religion.
However, despite this, a troubling trend emerges of economic destitution and neglect; this major issue is reflected in the constant push for better pension, unemployment and health coverage.
This begs the question: why is it that the elderly, while culturally so respected and relevant, so economically irrelevant?
The answer is that there are prevailing primary economic stereotypes that don’t value old people at the basic economic level.
The following stereotypes are unearthed with a review of media, expert opinions etc,
- The burden
- The father//mother role
- The wise parents
- Desperate old people
- ‘funny’ grandparents
- Money frauds
- Family parasite
- monarch/patriarch
- Con grandpa/ma
The above is non-exhaustive list; we also found that there is a huge problem of AGEISM in media and marketing.